How We Rate — Trino

Each review is built from seven criteria: licensing and regulation, the welcome offer and its wagering terms, the breadth of the game catalogue, the speed and reliability of payments, the quality of the mobile app, the responsiveness of support and the fairness of the account verification. We score each criterion independently before adding them up into the final mark.

Reviews are refreshed every three months. We log in with our test account, open the current bonus terms, make a small deposit and a withdrawal, and re-check every number on the page. If anything moved — withdrawal limit, wagering rate, app version — we rewrite the affected block and add a dated note under the H1.

Each criterion gets a 0-10 score. The final mark is a weighted average, rounded to one decimal. A mark of 8.5 and above means we recommend the site without reservations for UK players. Between 7.0 and 8.4 is acceptable with notes. Below 7.0 we flag at least one serious issue and recommend looking elsewhere.

Licensing and payouts carry the most weight at 20% each — a casino that stalls withdrawals cannot score high regardless of its game catalogue. Game catalogue, bonus fairness and support each sit at 15%. Mobile app and verification experience are 10% and 5% respectively. These weights have not changed since the site launched in 2024.

We cut points for: wagering requirements above x40, maximum bet rules below £2 on bonus balance, mandatory bonuses that cannot be refused, withdrawal times longer than 72 hours, support answers that contradict the published terms and KYC that keeps asking for documents after the first batch was approved. Each cut is documented in the review body, not hidden in a scorecard.